Owning a transit center in crisis

Scenario: You build a $50 million transit center where commuters can change buses in the warmth of a modern, heated terminal. And you have an $11 million contract with the city school district to transport students on your transit authority buses, often via the transit center.

RTS Transit Center, Rochester, NY. Photo by David Kassnoff.
Something disturbing takes place. There's a fight between students. And another. Then, an assault. And a stabbing. Some of these injure taxpaying commuters who indirectly helped build your $50 million wrestling/transit center.

Perception: your transit center is a dangerous place. Even the mayor says so. Publicly.

Your response? If you're the transit company, you blame the offending high school students. If you're the school superintendent, you keep repeating: "We can't fix it alone. Parents need to be involved."

My response? You both were absent when the class on "Leadership" took place.

There's no way to dollop out enough PR to fix this problem. You in the transit business won't be upfront with the media on what a public transit authority spends on private security, so your credibility is iffy. You in the school district have unruly, unsupervised, angry kids. You both have security guards whose main deterrent is a two-way radio. You have police officers who want to prevent crime, not supervise teenagers. 

The solution? Own the situation. Don't talk about it. Own it. Here's what that means:
  • The school superintendent needs to relocate his office to the transit center. Leave the site for meetings as needed, but being visible is essential. Walk your talk.
  • Same deal for the transit company's CEO. You built this shiny new facility; now go live there. Walk your talk. If it's really a safe place, show up.
  • Parent involvement? Great, but motivate them. Incentivize a parents foot patrol. Give them free 30-day bus passes. And pair them up with those police officers. Make everyone visible. 
And the disruptive kids? Nice try, but all you really did was relocate them from an unruly outdoor location on Main Street to an unruly indoor location. So stop rewarding them with bus rides and a nice transit center. 

Instead, implement a one-strike-and-you're-out rule. Get ugly in the RTS transit center, here's a free pair of Skechers. You're walking for the rest of the school year. 

And, if all else fails, pipe Vivaldi and Mozart into your shiny transit center, 24/7. No kid's going to hang around in the face of classical music.

Oh, did you lose ridership because commuters wanted no part of a hostile transit center? I have ideas for fixing that. But those ideas aren't free.



Popular posts from this blog

Questioning the New York (Times) Athletic Club

Image
The New York Times dropped the axe on its legendary sports department in early July. Sports reporting we read in the Times henceforth will originate with The Athletic, a younger (and perhaps more agile) sportswriting website purchased by the NYT Corp.  You'll find a good assessment of the move here .  As a Times subscriber, I have automatic access to any sports reporting it produces. I won't call it "free access," however, because my ever-increasing monthly rate for a three-day Times subscription surely will include a tithe to cover the Athletic.  But ditching the Times ' sports desk and dispersing its fine sports journalists and photographers to other NYT jobs? That's a loss. Here's why: Conflict of interest: The Athletic allows its staff to report on sports gambling, while some are paid contractors of the sportsbook companies. Is there a Pete Rose-style conflict here? I'd expect so. The Times allowed no double-dipping within its sports staff. The s
Read more

Your hand's already in my pocket

Image
I use an ad blocker, and probably you do, too. Every day, even on websites where I pay a monthly subscription fee, I see a pop-up that say: "We Notice You Are Using an Ad Blocker." And they ask me to turn it off. I don't. I'm already paying for that news website's reporting. Their hands are already in my pocket. And, truth is, I don't mind digital ads that are somewhat relevant to my tastes. Show me an ad for a guitar deal or Ford car parts, and I'll probably read it. Screen shot, unnamed Gannett publication, Sept. 2018 But I don't care about Patrick Swayze's secret son. Or what forgotten 1970s actress Loni Anderson looks like today. (I was more of a Howard Hesseman /Dr. Johnny Fever fan, anyway.) When newspapers relied on print ad revenue, I'd glance at those ads -- and sometimes, I'd bite -- because those ads were for local or regional merchants. They wanted to build a relationship with me.  They didn't try
Read more

Readers get the (drive) shaft in motorsports coverage

Image
In mid-August, the U.S.'s premier auto racing sport will compete at a road racing course in Watkins Glen, NY. NASCAR's brutish Cup series cars will race in this rural community Aug. 20.  May 2023, Charlotte Motor Speedway. (c) DKassnoff, 2023. But, don't expect  The New York Times  to cover NASCAR before then. The newspaper's sports section -- now outsourced to The Athletic, its sportsbook subsidiary -- hasn't covered NASCAR since July 2. That's when NASCAR's drivers competed on the rain-soaked streets of Chicago. The Times provided no coverage of their July 30 race in Richmond, VA, or any NASCAR race since early July. The Times  has focused its motorsports coverage on Formula 1 racing. These are the expensive, open-wheeled, high performance racing teams once called Grand Prix. This class of racing is controlled by another media company: John Malone's Liberty Media, which purchased Formula 1 in 2017 and returned it to profitability. Visit the Times '
Read more